*Link*
And then takes a hard shot at George W Bush:
George W. Bush, a good man without malice, nonetheless last week illustrated why Donald Trump is president.
While in Dubai, Bush criticized the Trump Administration’s lack of progress on immigration reform. Then he weirdly noted, “Americans don’t want to pick cotton at 105 degrees, but there are people who want to put food on their family’s tables and are willing to do that.”
Where to start when Republican elites confirm their own stereotypes?
First, Republicans should agree with Churchill’s dictum about the inadvisability of criticizing one’s government while in a foreign country: “When I am abroad I always make it a rule never to criticize or attack the Government of my own country. I make up for lost time when I come home.” Bush repeatedly followed that guidance when he insisted that he would not attack Barack Obama—even at home. But not now.
Second, Bush is far more critical of Trump’s efforts to reach a compromise on DACA and border security than he was of Barack Obama’s illegal and politically expedient 2012 pre-reelection executive order nullifying immigration law and enforcement. Whether he intended it or not, Bush’s “woke” emergence as a megaphone after eight years of hibernation, confirms the impression that Republican elites were always much closer in spirit to their Democratic counterparts than they were to their own so-called grassroots conservative base. Translated, they mildly were displeased with the Obama agenda, but loathe Trump’s.
Third, how incoherent were Bush’s cotton-picking riffs! (He may not have realized it, but Bush put a 21st-century spin on 19th-century plantation owners’ pleas that they needed imported chattel African labor because American workers were neither acclimatized to heat nor inexpensive enough to pick cotton in scorching Southern temperatures). Bush substantiated the stereotype of crass corporate concern (note the inadvertent contempt in “willing to do that”) that trumps both the law and the idea of promoting the wages of U.S. entry-level workers—as well as general popular cluelessness about illegal immigration in general.
I disagree that Bush was a man without malice.
His policies toward illegal immigration inflicted a lot of malice upon my class of people, and furthermore, he saw fit to insult us when we complained about it.
But the rest is spot on. This Hanson guy... seems to be the only one who 'gets' anything at all sometimes.
But he didn't stop there. He correctly calls out the NeverTrumpers as hypocrites:
The Trump catharsis has shown that about 10 percent of the Republican Party, the NeverTrumpers, was largely apolitical. That is, former cornerstone positions of deregulation and tax reform, oil and gas production, charter schools, deterrent foreign policy, restoring friendship with Israel and moving the embassy to Jerusalem were apparently always secondary to the more important criterion of offering a mild, sober and judicious frown to progressivism, through discerning losers like George H.W. Bush, John McCain, or Mitt Romney.
Such a Republican elite was so embedded within American establishment institutions as to be both immune from the economic stagnation of an Obama neo-socialist revolution (remember income inequality soared under Obama) and in no real need of a Reagan revolution or Trump’s often messy radical push-back against progressivism.
Its creed was not really, as advertised, the ethics of “losing nobly is better than winning ugly,” but rather the snobbery of “losing a cultural image is worse than winning a political agenda.” Put more bluntly, it is better to put up with a socialist with a “perfectly creased pant” than a prairie-fire conservative in rumpled Walmart slacks.Victor Davis Hanson may never be allowed to write for National Review again after these remarks.
Read the whole thing. There's a lot there.
5 comments:
Regarding picking cotton at 105 degrees, cotton is first of all harvested in the fall. It is not 105 degrees at that time, and moreover, it is done with mechanical combines. I once interviewed for a company that made them in Minnesota--it makes no sense until you realize that their key goal was to get them not to the South, but to Asia and Africa, and the town is along the old Great Northern route. Some vegetables are harvested in July and August, to be sure, but Bush really showed his ignorance with that cotton comment.
Which, really, backs up Hanson's argument. Both parties have, sadly, slipped out of noblesse oblige and into Marx's theories of class warfare--if I am to get the votes of class A, that necessarily means impugning class B. It doesn't have to be this way.
Bush didnt show his ignorance. he showed his disdain for the American working class.
he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, then looks down upon those who were not, and blames them for not being like him... but those Mexicans... they deserve a chance to work for him a lot cheaper than i would.
Ignorance about cotton, and arguably the notion that blue collar workers won't work at 105F was an insult. I remember doing that as a kid--downwind of a manure pile and a goose pen no less. Summer of 1988.
Good post. I referenced this column, too. Hanson is the one commenter on the scene who seems to understand the big picture these days.
But I posted first. Ha ha....
Post a Comment