I figure I may as well weigh-in on the Bowe Bergdahl thing, just I'll just post some thoughts on the matter:
For starters, I don't have much faith in the media to tell the whole story. No matter what I'm hearing, either from CNN, MSNBC, FNC or AJA (al jezera america, yes, i watch it...) I can't help but assume that I'm being spun and the truth is somewhere in the details that aren't spoken.
As for things unspoken... according to my brother, the word-rumor mill around the army is that he was not just a deserter, but also a collaborator. This has been floating among the soldiers themselves for several years, despite gag orders.
That stupidly stupid Rose Garden ceremony that POTUS staged for his parents is likely much warmer than any reception Sgt Bergdahl himself will ever receive from anybody.
Five high ranking Taliban in exchange for one dopey ass soldier seems like a fairly steep price.
POTUS, as Commander-In-Chief, has the authority to release anybody from military custody that he desires. All this about him 'breaking the law' means nothing when the law itself is illegal. That's just my take.
Wouldn't be awesome if POTUS really wanted to bring him home so as to subject him to the military justice system (who won't be wishy washy with him) while planting micro chips on the five Taliban leaders so as to track them for droning at a future date?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
POTUS, as Commander-In-Chief, has the authority to release anybody from military custody that he desires. All this about him 'breaking the law' means nothing when the law itself is illegal. That's just my take.
I think that's right, for the same reason that the sainted Boland Amendment was crap during the Reagan years. You can only have one CIC, not 536.
Now, having said that, you can certainly hold the one CIC accountable for his performance, which is somewhat happening.
I'll be curious to see if the collaborator allegations prove out.
Glad you're back in the game, good sir.
Post a Comment