Making The Super Bowl Even More Super Than That

The road to the Super Bowl is paved with hard work performed in often times brutal conditions.
Neither rain, sleet, nor snow prevents the game of football from being played, the weather being as much a part of the battle as the skills and determination of the opposing teams.
And just like covered domes are viewed as the 12th man on the field for home teams, so are snow and ice for teams such as Chicago, Pittsburgh, Buffalo and a host of others.

So it seems to be a bastardisation to have the championship game decided in milder climates, or covered domes, year after year.
To me, this ain't right.
The advantages or disadvantages of weather are as much a part of getting to the Super Bowl as anything, so I propose that these parameters of extreme should be allowed to play in the final result as well.

It'll go like this:
Every host city will take a turn hosting the big game. We will know in advance, 32 years in advance, where the next Super Bowl will be played. We can start with a lottery to decide the order of the first round of cities, and then just follow the pattern from there.

It will also mean the very real possibility of any kind of weather much of the time.
San Diego in the 70's? Nice.
An arctic front sweeping Green Bay in early February? Cool. Let's see what these guys are made of. Who's really the toughest and most determined to overcome adversity.

Other positives:
A game played in Tampa Bay won't face the usual black out threat.
Fans in Minnesota will actually know the real presence of a Lombardi Trophy in their stadium, if only for a few hours.
Los Angeles will continue to be shut out of the NFL.
And it means that the likelihood of a cold weather team getting a home field advantage for the Super Bowl will extend to those who up until now have been denied that possibility.